TypeScript
Types that deliver
React
UI that converts
Next.js
App Router, seriously
Angular
Enterprise, modern
Nuxt
Vue, full stack
NestJS
APIs with boundary protection
Vue
Precise UIs
Node.js
Runtime with responsibility
Remix
Web fundamentals first
Medusa.js
Composable Commerce
StrapiContent APIs with control
DirectusSQL data as secure APIs
Payload CMSNext.js backend in TypeScript
Encore.tsAPIs and infrastructure as code
Shopify HydrogenShopify storefronts built with React.
VendureHeadless Commerce for B2B
HTMX
HTML that works
JavaScript
Edge language
Alpine.js
Interaction without bloat
Vanilla JS
Framework-free, full control
React Native
Mobile, one team
PostgreSQL
Data that lasts
DevOps
Pipelines that deliver
GitLab
Repo, CI, releases
Dedicated Resource · React
A dedicated React developer from Typescriptaz builds interfaces that feel like a product: Server Components where they make sense, client state where users click. No tutorial architectures—components your team will still enjoy working with in two years.
Use
Your React developer owns whole feature slices — from ticket to merged pull request. That includes accessible components, clean data flows with TanStack Query, and tests produced during the sprint, not sometime later.
With React and the stable React Compiler, the emphasis shifts: less manual useMemo, more architectural questions around server and client. Those who need SSR and SEO combine React with a framework like Next.js; for pure web apps, Vite is often sufficient. We help decide — and implement it.
For decision-makers, predictability matters most: a frontend that absorbs new requirements without every feature blowing the budget. That's how we work—small, verifiable steps instead of large overhauls whose results only appear at the end.
Typical mandates: Product SaaS, dashboards, customer portals, marketing-app hybrids.
Tools: React, Vite, Next.js, Tailwind, Radix, Playwright
Book directly
$12,500 / month
150 hours, directly employed and dedicated solely to your backlog. At kickoff, you meet the person before work begins.
Quick explanation
React is a JavaScript library for user interfaces, originally developed by Meta and now one of the most widely used frontend technologies worldwide. Interfaces are built from reusable components that manage their own state. With Server Components and frameworks like Next.js or React Router, server rendering is now common. For businesses, this means a huge ecosystem, many available libraries, and a technology that suits small widgets as well as large product platforms.
Expertise
Seniority isn’t shown on the resume but in code review. Our team looks for it with React.
01
With Server Components, Suspense, and streaming, there are more options than ever to load and render data. A senior React developer deliberately decides which parts remain on the server and which must be interactive — and keeps those boundaries visible in the code.
02
Server data belongs in a cache like TanStack Query, local UI state stays in the component, and global state is the exception. This discipline keeps large applications maintainable and prevents the common mistake of having three places manage the same value.
03
Keyboard navigation, focus management, sensible ARIA attributes, and sufficient contrasts are part of our definition of done. That saves expensive rework and has been legally relevant for many digital offerings since the European Accessibility Act.
04
An experienced developer measures bundle size, interaction times, and re-renders instead of guessing. With React DevTools, Lighthouse, and performance budgets in CI, regressions are detected before your users feel them.
Typical situations
01
The backend is ready, the design is finished—only implementation stalls? An additional React developer picks up entire feature slices.
02
Components, tokens, Storybook, documentation: we build the library so product teams prefer to use it instead of crafting their own buttons.
03
Oversized bundles, unnecessary re‑renders, load waterfalls? We measure, prioritize, and bring interaction back under your performance budgets.
Risk under control
The biggest risks in React projects are rarely technical puzzles; they’re decisions that backfire months later. We see three of them especially often:
As a frontend ages, the instinct is to rebuild everything. That almost always takes longer than planned and stalls product development. We modernize area by area so old and new parts can run side by side for a while.
Each release gets a bit slower—until users drop off. With fixed performance budgets and CI measurements, any degradation becomes visible before it goes live. That way, the UI stays fast even after the twentieth feature.
A frontend project quickly pulls in hundreds of packages. Outdated or abandoned libraries become a security and upgrade risk. We keep dependencies lean, update regularly, and evaluate new packages before they enter the project.
Without shared components, each team builds its own buttons, forms, and dialogs. That costs time and leads to inconsistencies users notice. We establish a design system with clear rules and document it so it can be maintained without us.
Transparency
Business case
A dedicated React developer pays off through speed and quality. A tidy component system lowers the cost of each new feature because building blocks are reused rather than rebuilt. Faster pages improve conversion and user satisfaction, and accessible interfaces open your product to more people. At the same time, the risk of costly rewrites falls because technical debt is reduced continuously. For decision‑makers that means: the frontend budget that goes into product value instead of rework.
The first two weeks
Analysis, first delivery, clear plan. Read about how we work in general at How we work.
01
How are components, state, and data queries organized? We provide an overview and highlight the biggest problem areas.
02
The first tickets go into review, including tests and Storybook entries where they already exist.
03
By the end of the second week, you'll receive a proposal for architecture, performance, and the design system—prioritized by value.
After kickoff
How a typical engagement develops after the first two weeks—aligned with your backlog.
01
Onboarding, component review, and initial features in production. In parallel, we compile a list of the biggest architecture and performance issues.
02
Shared components, clearer data flows, and performance budgets in CI. New features already benefit from the initial building blocks.
03
The design system grows, tests cover critical flows, and features go live faster with less rework.
Example scenario
A company runs a customer portal with many historically grown pages. Each interface looks slightly different and small changes take longer than necessary. A dedicated React developer starts with an inventory of components and simultaneously builds the first shared building blocks.
Pages gradually migrate to the new design system, documented in Storybook. New features are delivered faster because forms, tables, and dialogs no longer need to be rebuilt—and the UI becomes more accessible.
For product owners, the effect is quickly visible: feature tickets become smaller, design approvals move faster, and support no longer sees errors caused by inconsistent UIs.
Collaboration
For a product that is continuously developed, the monthly plan fits best: a person who knows your frontend and delivers features every sprint. For bounded tasks like a performance audit or introducing Storybook, an hour bundle is suitable.
If you want to see whether the collaboration fits beforehand, start with the discovery package—including a code review of your existing codebase.
All rates, pools, and effective prices are detailed in the Pricing table.
Straight talk
React isn’t always the best answer. For a predominantly static website with little interaction, a framework is often overhead—server-rendered pages with some Alpine.js are sufficient. And if your team is firmly invested in Vue or Angular, we don’t recommend switching without a clear reason. A framework change costs months, and the benefit must significantly outweigh that time.
For IT decision-makers
Can the person explain when Server Components are useful—and when they're not?
How do you separate server data, UI state, and global state?
Do they test keyboard navigation and screen reader behavior themselves?
Which performance metrics does she measure before optimizing?
Can they sketch a modernization plan without a big-bang rewrite?
Glossary
Components that are rendered on the server and send no JavaScript to the browser.
The moment the browser makes server‑rendered HTML interactive with JavaScript.
Shared library of components, rules, and design tokens for a consistent product.
Google’s metrics for page load time, responsiveness, and visual stability.
Often a good fit
Frequently asked questions
Generally, yes. Our senior React engineers know App Router and Server Components. If the framework itself is the focus—caching, rendering strategies, deployment—a specialized Next.js developer is the better choice.
Yes. We'll modernize class components, legacy Redux, or an aging build setup incrementally—without a big-bang rewrite and without blocking new features.
Absolutely. Your React developer works alongside design in the same sprint, works from Figma handoffs, and builds components to fit the design system—not just one screen.
That depends on the codebase and access. If onboarding is prepared, the first small tickets typically go into review in the first week. Larger features follow once architecture and conventions are clear—typically within the first two sprints.
Yes—tests are part of the Definition of Done: unit tests for logic, component tests for UI building blocks, and end‑to‑end tests with Playwright for critical flows. We don’t replace a dedicated QA team, but we make your life significantly easier.
Yes. Whether MUI, Chakra, shadcn/ui, Radix, or a custom system: we work with what you have and evolve it. We recommend switching only if the existing system measurably slows you down.
Where appropriate, yes. The compiler takes over much of the manual memoization. Before applying it, we check that your code follows React's rules—otherwise unexpected behavior can occur.
We first assess which parts truly need global state. Server data usually moves into a cache like TanStack Query; the rest stays as is or is simplified—step by step rather than all at once.
Yes—that’s our aim. Documented components, clear conventions, and code reviews with your team ensure you can take over at any time—without dependency on us.
Bottom line
A dedicated React developer delivers features that feel like a product and keeps the frontend fast, accessible, and maintainable. You retain control of the roadmap and code, see progress weekly, and can take over at any time—without a big‑bang rewrite and without reliance on individual contributors.
Next step
Tell us the stack, scope, and start window. We usually respond within one business day—with a specific person instead of a stack of profiles.
Quick contact
TypeScript resources from Austria and Germany, permanently employed with us. Tell us the stack, scope, and desired start date. We typically respond the same business day — with availability, appropriate seniority, and a concrete start window.
US & European billing
Choose the contracting entity that fits your procurement process. Engagements can be contracted and invoiced through our European locations or through Anexia Inc.152 W. 57th Street, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10019, USA. Talk to us about billing.